Friday, May 15, 2009


If you want to interview someone. Don't shot yourself in the foot by talking about them before an interview, write or publish things about them that is not true or have been proven. No one will get an interview who has done this. Why would anyone in their right mind be interviewed by someone who appears bias right off the bat? I believe in interviews face to face none of the over the phone bullshit.

If you are truly interested in interviewing someone don't try and blow smoke up their ass for an interview. Just freaking ask, how hard is that? Then when you are asked a question by the "potential interviewee" answer it and don't dance around the question. If you want an interview expect questions to be ask of you before hand. What people/media fail to realize is that not everyone you want to interview is a complete idiot. Maybe if you give them some credit they would consider speaking with you.

We have no problem setting up interviews as long as it is with a respectable person/network/reporter who is not bias one way or another. We thank those of you who have requested and welcome others. If you have done any of the above mentioned items, then don't bother waisting your time even asking.


Anonymous said...

Pharisee *cough cough*

I dont' know why people think they can get somewhere after being so flippantly rude about everything. It amazes me.

Anonymous said...

I would be interested in possibly interviewing you if your Rozita or Rozita. I will check with my editor and get back to you.

The Pharisee said...

I'd love to Rozita, but I don't have the time or $$$ to do this in person.

Maybe you can get us both on Oprah or O'Reilly or Larry King. I'm sure they would listen to you, you're far more important than I am.

As an antagonist (in your view), I am better equipped to interview you than anyone else out there. Though I am sure my knowledge is in error in some places, in others, it's not.


Rozita said...

Hugh, What makes you better equipped to interview Rozita than anyone else out there? Nothing but bias has been shown on your part. A true journalist does not get emotionally involved in a "story." If this had been something that you had been reporting on for years or decades and you had family connections involved I could see it. Granted there are times it occurs we're all human.

You jumped on the bandwagon and started spewing hate. No one would hire you as a journalist with that approach.

The Pharisee said...

I'm not looking to get hired as a journalist.

Besides, I have a blog bigger than some of the smaller newspapers out there already.

There's no story in being interviewed by someone like "Kate Rosemary," but there would be one in being interviewed by moi.

If you want I can arrange someone more objective. I just want the story told.

Jam Inn said...

Rose Mr. Hugh just wants to feed his ego and 'scoop' Bill "Wacky" Medvecky for his blog site. You see Mr. McBryde has convinced only himself that he can investigate you better than the Texas Rangers can do in the ona and only interview of you. You remember, the interview that asked about "Sarah" and ended with no co-operation or information from you. He is well aware that you are facing a charge and have an attorney to represent your interests but he ignores that fact and has chosen to be the 'SUPER' sleuth vigilante force of one. He posts his tripe on his blog and solicits "0" Comments, so don't rush into any eyewitness interview with this 'Child McBride" because you might become associated with his lowlife peer group.